<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What part of the information in the hacked e-mail of global warming scientists was most disturbing to you?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you</link>
	<description>It's a beautiful world. Let's save it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:38:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: karena p</title>
		<link>http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you/comment-page-1#comment-8132</link>
		<dc:creator>karena p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you#comment-8132</guid>
		<description>Global warming is just the trumped up idea of Washington  DC. A way to fine companies and individuals if they dont comply.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global warming is just the trumped up idea of Washington  DC. A way to fine companies and individuals if they dont comply.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeeper_peeper321</title>
		<link>http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you/comment-page-1#comment-8131</link>
		<dc:creator>jeeper_peeper321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you#comment-8131</guid>
		<description>Evidently these people don&#039;t read or listen to the news very much.


Links are below.

They will probably say the NY Times, MSNBC and US News and World Reports are all conservative global warming deniers.

And the links are all fake.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/science/earth/21climate.html?bl

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34079149/ns/us_news-washington_post/

http://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2009/11/21/hackers-leak-e-mails-stoke-climate-debate.html?s_cid=rss:hackers-leak-e-mails-stoke-climate-debate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evidently these people don&#8217;t read or listen to the news very much.</p>
<p>Links are below.</p>
<p>They will probably say the NY Times, MSNBC and US News and World Reports are all conservative global warming deniers.</p>
<p>And the links are all fake.<br /><b>References : </b><br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/science/earth/21climate.html?bl" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/science/earth/21climate.html?bl</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34079149/ns/us_news-washington_post/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34079149/ns/us_news-washington_post/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2009/11/21/hackers-leak-e-mails-stoke-climate-debate.html?s_cid=rss:hackers-leak-e-mails-stoke-climate-debate" rel="nofollow">http://www.usnews.com/science/articles/2009/11/21/hackers-leak-e-mails-stoke-climate-debate.html?s_cid=rss:hackers-leak-e-mails-stoke-climate-debate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ningis n</title>
		<link>http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you/comment-page-1#comment-8130</link>
		<dc:creator>ningis n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you#comment-8130</guid>
		<description>time out !!!!



the most disturbing part was the fact that the email was hacked.

Can we get our sanity back please??

my lord !!!!!  what is our world coming to? what is our country turning into? what happened to decency and right and wrong?????&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>time out !!!!</p>
<p>the most disturbing part was the fact that the email was hacked.</p>
<p>Can we get our sanity back please??</p>
<p>my lord !!!!!  what is our world coming to? what is our country turning into? what happened to decency and right and wrong?????<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you/comment-page-1#comment-8129</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you#comment-8129</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t see it, but with what you noted, they obviously work for Obama, the Destroyer! oh yeah, and the Liar! What&#039;s even more disturbing, is hearing about GOOD Scientists who are onto something, and have mysteriously died over the years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t see it, but with what you noted, they obviously work for Obama, the Destroyer! oh yeah, and the Liar! What&#8217;s even more disturbing, is hearing about GOOD Scientists who are onto something, and have mysteriously died over the years.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcpnum4green@att.net</title>
		<link>http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you/comment-page-1#comment-8128</link>
		<dc:creator>jcpnum4green@att.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you#comment-8128</guid>
		<description>The unlawful destruction of evidence or files just in case people tried to get this information through the freedom of information request acts.

 The adding of real data on some records that were made up of falsified data and this was called the trick…

They go on to talk about how the actual data doesn’t support their theory and the planet is really cooling. Then they blame it on inadequate ways of gathering data or temperature readings. In the e-mails there is clear frustration and anxiety over this.


Edit: They are a small part of the larger group of scientists who are corrupted by the lure of easy money. The irony behind this is the global warming could be considered a religion to those people who believe in its existence, but have no religious denominations&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The unlawful destruction of evidence or files just in case people tried to get this information through the freedom of information request acts.</p>
<p> The adding of real data on some records that were made up of falsified data and this was called the trick…</p>
<p>They go on to talk about how the actual data doesn’t support their theory and the planet is really cooling. Then they blame it on inadequate ways of gathering data or temperature readings. In the e-mails there is clear frustration and anxiety over this.</p>
<p>Edit: They are a small part of the larger group of scientists who are corrupted by the lure of easy money. The irony behind this is the global warming could be considered a religion to those people who believe in its existence, but have no religious denominations<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hxyz</title>
		<link>http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you/comment-page-1#comment-8127</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hxyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you#comment-8127</guid>
		<description>Why hasn&#039;t anyone posting these question put up a link to prove their case? Scientists don&#039;t want to lose their credibility - if they lose it once it is gone forever - you don&#039;t get it back. The vast majority of climate scientists (and John McCain) acknowledge that global warming is real and that its cause is manmade. The only real question now is what to do about it. Unless of course you would like to show why your credentials in supercomputer modeling of global atmospheric climatology is better than the guys with the Ph.D. educations? This is a science issue - not a political one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why hasn&#8217;t anyone posting these question put up a link to prove their case? Scientists don&#8217;t want to lose their credibility &#8211; if they lose it once it is gone forever &#8211; you don&#8217;t get it back. The vast majority of climate scientists (and John McCain) acknowledge that global warming is real and that its cause is manmade. The only real question now is what to do about it. Unless of course you would like to show why your credentials in supercomputer modeling of global atmospheric climatology is better than the guys with the Ph.D. educations? This is a science issue &#8211; not a political one.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rokaround</title>
		<link>http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you/comment-page-1#comment-8126</link>
		<dc:creator>rokaround</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.global-warming-information.com/global-warming-information/what-part-of-the-information-in-the-hacked-e-mail-of-global-warming-scientists-was-most-disturbing-to-you#comment-8126</guid>
		<description>Where did you see all this? or did you imagine it?
Show us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you see all this? or did you imagine it?<br />
Show us.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
