Glenn Beck: The Great Global Warming Swindle
Written by admin on Sep 24th, 2008 | Filed under: global warming
April 2007 - Glenn Beck discusses global warming theories.
Duration : 0:6:7
Global Warming is the main concern of the humankind these days
It is affecting your life and will do more in the near future. It's time you learn a little more and take action.
April 2007 - Glenn Beck discusses global warming theories.
Duration : 0:6:7
Conspiracy arises …
Conspiracy arises when people don’t spend enough time on doing constructive things. Instead of being in favor of an issue, like ending povery, people seek out being against something that is widely accepted. Maybe we should spend less and conserve more, not to save the earth from global warming, but so we will have more money to spend on some good things like fixing our bridges and schools.
Yes - excellent …
Yes - excellent point! The reason is because science shows that the Ozone layer naturally regenerates! But you don’t hear about the good news on mass media they want to brainwash the public into thinking we live in and then we go out and create what they have programmed us to create. We create reality, and those who can program us what to create, therefore control us!! Start to think for yourself - and educate yourself - and you are FREE!!
Remember the …
Remember the hysteria about the ozone layer? You almost never hear it even briefly mentioned anymore.
It’s all about the …
It’s all about the money, trillions of dollars. If you get in the way of the greedy bastards and their money, you will be persecuted.
The earth is much …
The earth is much cooler now than in 1998. The cooling is noticeable. According to NASA satellite temperature sensors and the Met Office Hadley Centre in the UK there has been no year since 1998 that has been as warm or warmer than 1998. Also those same NASA satellite sensors show quick cooling in the earth since January 2007.
All this time though since 1998 co2 levels have been rising.
excuse me?…
no …
excuse me?…
no im not a “religion freak” i barely even go to church or anything but come on its common sense!
biznatch!
oh god another …
oh god another religion freak…
in my opinion …
in my opinion people are over reacting alot about global warming and going green and all of that.
god is the only one that knows when the world is going to end and HE is the one that decides when it comes to an end so it doesnt matter if we use arosol cans or use eco friendly stuff its going to end one way or another and oviously humans have nothing to do with it becaus god controlls it NOT humans!
Remember what ms …
Remember what ms Tacher once said:
“To me, consensus seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects.”
“The changes and …
“The changes and rates of change in the Earth’s temperature, just since the Industrial Revolution, have occurred many times in our climatic history. While climate scientists generally agree that the Earth’s temperature is always changing, not many of them would say that humans are responsible for those changes”
~Walter Cunningham
Apollo 7 Astronaut
UCLA Physics BS with honors 1960, MS with distinction 1961
IGPP Doctorate Physics
NASA Space Sciences and Geology 2,000 hours education 1963-71
“..you only have to …
“..you only have to go back to the Medieval Warming Period, from the 10th to the 14th Century, to find an intense global warming episode, followed immediately by the drastic cooling of the Little Ice Age. Neither of these events were caused by variations in CO2 levels”
~Walter Cunningham
Apollo 7 Astronaut
UCLA Physics BS with honors, 1960, MS with distinction, 1961
Inst of Geophysics And Planetary Sciences, Doctorate in Physics
NASA Space Sciences and Geology, 2,000 hours education 1963-71
There has yet been …
There has yet been one person to present beyond a dough, that humans are the cause for climate change. There is also not one finding that shows if we do this, and that, everything will be just fine. Remember Y2K? Billions spent on that BULLSHIT.
a “great” …
a “great” documentary which uses data up to 1980. Great! idiots.
Glenn Beck is a …
Glenn Beck is a hypocrite. He proclaims a pragmatic approach, but throws that completely out of the window when it comes to the illegal Iraq war and being a puppet for propaganda.
The Sun? THAT is …
The Sun? THAT is just CRAZY!
One of the leading …
One of the leading theories that says that man is responsible for global warming is “hot spots” in the atmosphere above major developments. After over 10 years of research and testing, these hot spots have yet to be found. The most sensible theory I have heard is that maybe,just maybe,some years we revolve around the big ball of fire known as the sun closer than other years which can cause higher temperatures than in other years…but that just seems too simple and less profitable for Al Gore.
Its funny that …
Its funny that scientists believe that they can predict 5-10 years into the future with computer models and say that global warming is a real threat that is man made. The truth is that you can predict future weather patterns accuratly but it takes over a week for a supercomputer to compute data for 1 second into the future. Global warming is just a scare tactic used by the government in order to keep people under their thumb. If you watch any major news station you know that fear sells.
Never has so much …
Never has so much ego been accompanied by so little talent since Martha Stewart,Donald Trump,and Rosie O’y,I WISH I were a Donald, had a three-way. The Beckster!:o)
haha
haha
simple solution to …
simple solution to get global warming taxes for every citizen on the globe is to fine anyone that disagrees with global warming (in public) $50,000.
Similar to how some countries fine anyone that says the holocaust had less than 7 mil or 12 mil or 38 million victims. Fine them to end the debate so we can save the 42 polar bears that are left on Earth!
I would also strongly suggest that most global warming funding go to Israel since they’re the chosen people they can fix things fast!
You are right..I …
You are right..I just read the OFCOMS report and only the last section is a little kind of on the side of the complainers because of not enough time given. nothing in there says that there was misinformation.. The BBC of course did their own inaccurate report of the report. Sir David King complain and the explanation sounds more Like a Monty Phyton’s dead parrot script.
Poor word choice on …
Poor word choice on my part (”courts”). I would need links to Durkin admitting such things, i don’t have time at this moment. I can say (with accuracy) the London High Court actually found factual errors in Gore’s infamous propaganda piece (10/07). Has the Goracle admitted to his deception?
The “Courts” did no …
The “Courts” did no such thing. You are thinking of Ofcoms findings, which were restricted by the remit they are given by the British govt. If do some research, you will find that Durkin admits to using old, manipulated and superceded data and graphs. He also takes out of context many of the quotes from scientists he uses. The scientist he brought in to support his daft theories are all directly ir indirectly funded by the oil industry. Very objective. Still, at least the world is flat, huh.
Wrong. The courts …
Wrong. The courts found the film was unfair in it’s “treatment of some scientists”. But “a separate complaint about accuracy, which contained 131 specific points and ran to 270 pages, will find that [Channel 4] did not breach the regulator’s broadcasting code and did not materially mislead viewers.” In other words, materially correct, hurt the feelings of some scientists.
The Great Global …
The Great Global Warming Swindle has been thoroughly unmasked as a hatchet job. Channel 4 in the UK has been spouting this sort of pseudo-scientific polemic for years. Durkin distorted graphs, cherry-picked quotes and simply lied his way through the biggest swindle ever broadcast on mainstream TV. But there are plenty of Glenn Becks out there dumb enough to lap it up without looking objectively at the argument.