It was eugenics?? … It was eugenics?? Don’t tell me you’ve fallen on that conspiracy theory bandwagon too? You poor pathetic soul. Obviously, evidence and observations don’t concern you. Leave it up to people like you to proclaim conspiracies when you lack the brainpower to even comprehend such difficult, complex subjects.
jffryfnt Said,
‘Amateur skeptics’ … ‘Amateur skeptics’ DON’T HAVE DATA, period!
Oh, you’re talking ‘correlations’? Funny that, because I’m not. Pity you for falling on your face in assuming the CO2 and temps have a lockstep monotonic relationship, completely ignorant of the fact that a great multitude of things influence climate.
CO2, is a GHG. It’s lifetime in the atmosphere, has the potential for force climate. This is all simple physics. The recent warming, for some reason can’t be explained by anything other than CO2. Period.
mjkwyo Said,
The world rolls the … The world rolls the way it wants to!
LPLandingZone Said,
The “amateur … The “amateur skeptics” are at least not fabricating their data.
They don’t have to; the correlation between solar radiance is massive, while CO2 and temp now go in OPPOSITE directions, creating the need for the disgraceful HadCRU and Hansen frauds.
Oh, and tell us another lie about the polar bears,who are doing better than ever.
You lying demagogues.
LPLandingZone Said,
You have to go back … You have to go back to the early 20th century to see a scientific fraud this large, with huge consequences.
It was eugenics.
siliggy Said,
Oblentehands
What … Oblentehands
What happens to a farmer who thinks ahead and plants an orchard of trees in line with IPCC predictions. Then after ten years of sustainable farm practice and honest hard work looses the lot in the cold?
This is just one example of damage that can be done. There are countless thousands of others.
Oblentehands Said,
“We are being … “We are being conned” it says in the end – how can anybody feel conned by this? Can you not think? No matter what, pollution is pollution and it DOES kill man and species every day. What harm can it do to ANYONE to decrease the amount of poison and chemicals in the environment – but the big, irresponsible companies, that ONLY think of profit? Will you deny holocaust too? Behave yourselves.
jaydenluke Said,
Haha lucky no one … Haha lucky no one is gonna be fooled by this crap since the ad is made so poorly.
What a poor and dated argument -get with the programme guys.
AGWtruth1 Said,
express you opinion … express you opinion about the AGW scam at
sciencemuseum org uk
edbarbarg Said,
At least it is data … At least it is data. Compare that to “The snows of Kilimanjaro are on account of AGW.” “Polar bears are dying because of lack of ice.”
I know, these things are science, but observation is not. You leftist AGW people used every chance to throw unrelated links in the face of the populace. How dare you quibble with real data.
jffryfnt Said,
and delusions of … and delusions of paranoia…ugh.
jffryfnt Said,
‘Recent trends show … ‘Recent trends show…’?
Is this an argument? IF it is, apparently it’s not referring to CLIMATE. By the way, did anyone HAPPEN to take note of the current state of the sun and the lack of sunspots? Ammunition for the purely amateur climate skeptic by cutting down the evidence into whatever size box you want to make your case. That’s easy. Too bad for them it takes real effort and work to understand what is real.
xaedmon Said,
Word to the wise
… Word to the wise
the New World religion is on the rise
An iron fist in a velvet glove
is grasping your throats in the name of green love
Like a flock of birds
the public’s thoughts are guided by politically correct words
to conform as they should
for the approval of being good
Few have a hope
of escaping a sociological raping
of this scope
a tsunami of change is breaking on our shores
& soon the green police will be breaking down our doors
to put a choke chain leash on you & yours
BruceH59 Said,
The global warming … The global warming scandal of the century
Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.
krf7 Said,
That sea rise graph … That sea rise graph is a bit deceptive. A better explanation would be that the rate of sea level rise is not increasing, as predicted. Sea levels, regardless of whether humans are here or not, would be rising every single year as we are still emerging from the last ice age. A detailed look at that graph shows this minimal rise each year, and there is no acceleration whatsoever. The assumptions made about sea level rise appears to be quite exaggerated based upon that adat.
alignwithtruth Said,
Hi EasyEs, have a … Hi EasyEs, have a look at the recent work by Prof Richard Lindzen MIT (20 year ERBE experiment). He has shown why the IPCC predictive models are wrong. Its to do with IPCC models overestimating feedback factors, ie: CO2 warming effect being amplified too much by water vapour. Lindzen’s experiment shows the error. AGW will soon be shown to be wrong I hope it can be corrected before we bankrupt ourselves solving a problem that does not exist.
ndyt Said,
tHoM0r, so you … tHoM0r, so you think the CO2 output of North America would be the same if the population was the same as it was 100 years ago?
Climate sceptics TV ad
It was eugenics?? …
It was eugenics?? Don’t tell me you’ve fallen on that conspiracy theory bandwagon too? You poor pathetic soul. Obviously, evidence and observations don’t concern you. Leave it up to people like you to proclaim conspiracies when you lack the brainpower to even comprehend such difficult, complex subjects.
‘Amateur skeptics’ …
‘Amateur skeptics’ DON’T HAVE DATA, period!
Oh, you’re talking ‘correlations’? Funny that, because I’m not. Pity you for falling on your face in assuming the CO2 and temps have a lockstep monotonic relationship, completely ignorant of the fact that a great multitude of things influence climate.
CO2, is a GHG. It’s lifetime in the atmosphere, has the potential for force climate. This is all simple physics. The recent warming, for some reason can’t be explained by anything other than CO2. Period.
The world rolls the …
The world rolls the way it wants to!
The “amateur …
The “amateur skeptics” are at least not fabricating their data.
They don’t have to; the correlation between solar radiance is massive, while CO2 and temp now go in OPPOSITE directions, creating the need for the disgraceful HadCRU and Hansen frauds.
Oh, and tell us another lie about the polar bears,who are doing better than ever.
You lying demagogues.
You have to go back …
You have to go back to the early 20th century to see a scientific fraud this large, with huge consequences.
It was eugenics.
Oblentehands
What …
Oblentehands
What happens to a farmer who thinks ahead and plants an orchard of trees in line with IPCC predictions. Then after ten years of sustainable farm practice and honest hard work looses the lot in the cold?
This is just one example of damage that can be done. There are countless thousands of others.
“We are being …
“We are being conned” it says in the end – how can anybody feel conned by this? Can you not think? No matter what, pollution is pollution and it DOES kill man and species every day. What harm can it do to ANYONE to decrease the amount of poison and chemicals in the environment – but the big, irresponsible companies, that ONLY think of profit? Will you deny holocaust too? Behave yourselves.
Haha lucky no one …
Haha lucky no one is gonna be fooled by this crap since the ad is made so poorly.
What a poor and dated argument -get with the programme guys.
express you opinion …
express you opinion about the AGW scam at
sciencemuseum org uk
At least it is data …
At least it is data. Compare that to “The snows of Kilimanjaro are on account of AGW.” “Polar bears are dying because of lack of ice.”
I know, these things are science, but observation is not. You leftist AGW people used every chance to throw unrelated links in the face of the populace. How dare you quibble with real data.
and delusions of …
and delusions of paranoia…ugh.
‘Recent trends show …
‘Recent trends show…’?
Is this an argument? IF it is, apparently it’s not referring to CLIMATE. By the way, did anyone HAPPEN to take note of the current state of the sun and the lack of sunspots? Ammunition for the purely amateur climate skeptic by cutting down the evidence into whatever size box you want to make your case. That’s easy. Too bad for them it takes real effort and work to understand what is real.
Word to the wise
…
Word to the wise
the New World religion is on the rise
An iron fist in a velvet glove
is grasping your throats in the name of green love
Like a flock of birds
the public’s thoughts are guided by politically correct words
to conform as they should
for the approval of being good
Few have a hope
of escaping a sociological raping
of this scope
a tsunami of change is breaking on our shores
& soon the green police will be breaking down our doors
to put a choke chain leash on you & yours
The global warming …
The global warming scandal of the century
Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.
That sea rise graph …
That sea rise graph is a bit deceptive. A better explanation would be that the rate of sea level rise is not increasing, as predicted. Sea levels, regardless of whether humans are here or not, would be rising every single year as we are still emerging from the last ice age. A detailed look at that graph shows this minimal rise each year, and there is no acceleration whatsoever. The assumptions made about sea level rise appears to be quite exaggerated based upon that adat.
Hi EasyEs, have a …
Hi EasyEs, have a look at the recent work by Prof Richard Lindzen MIT (20 year ERBE experiment). He has shown why the IPCC predictive models are wrong. Its to do with IPCC models overestimating feedback factors, ie: CO2 warming effect being amplified too much by water vapour. Lindzen’s experiment shows the error. AGW will soon be shown to be wrong I hope it can be corrected before we bankrupt ourselves solving a problem that does not exist.
tHoM0r, so you …
tHoM0r, so you think the CO2 output of North America would be the same if the population was the same as it was 100 years ago?
Add A Comment